We built a commercial general contractor an estimating platform that reads a set of floor plans and returns a full line-item construction budget — priced across all 21 CSI divisions, benchmarked against the market, and exported as a client-ready proposal in the estimator’s own bid-sheet format.
Estimating is the bottleneck at the front of every construction deal. A credible budget means a senior estimator reading every sheet, measuring areas, counting fixtures, and pricing each trade — hours of skilled work before anyone knows whether the project pencils. That cost forces a hard choice: turn away early-stage inquiries, or burn senior-estimator hours on deals that may never close.
This client wanted to answer the question for far more prospects, far faster — without lowering the quality of the number, and without replacing the estimator’s judgment.
Floor plans go in — multiple sheets at once, full resolution, no downscaling.
A vision model extracts the scope — square footage, space type, finish level, room and fixture counts — and pre-fills the entire review form. It grades its own confidence on every field: anything ambiguous is flagged in amber for a human to confirm.
Every field is editable. Nothing is priced until a person has reviewed what the machine read.
All 21 CSI divisions, priced from rate tables built out of the estimator’s own historical bids — not a published cost book — then benchmarked against a market range so an off-the-rails number never goes out looking authoritative.
The engine was tuned by comparing its output, division by division, against a senior estimator’s actual sealed bids from six completed projects, and adjusting the rate tables until they agreed. In aggregate across that calibration set, the engine’s totals landed within a fraction of a percent of the estimator’s own — a −0.2% aggregate variance on the calibrated sector. That’s the Mirror Test: the engine had to reproduce bids the estimator already knew were right before anyone asked it to price something new. (Individual projects vary more; that’s why every output is benchmarked and reviewed.)
One validated production run turned a single set of inputs into a $413,983 detailed proposal and, in feasibility mode, a matching $373K–$455K budget band — two views of the same engine, agreeing with each other.
No staff displaced. The estimator reviews every field the AI fills, and final pricing stays with the estimator’s judgment and real sub-bids.
The hard part — getting a machine to reliably read a drawing set, translate it into structured scope, and price it in your format — is built and proven. The cost model calibrates to your trades, your tiers, your market. See the costing platform →
Bring a real set of floor plans — a project you’ve already bid, or the inquiry sitting in your inbox. We’ll run it through the engine and put the budget next to your own numbers, division by division.
Calibrated against a senior estimator’s actual sealed bids from six completed projects, the engine’s totals landed within −0.2% in aggregate on the calibrated sector. One validated run turned a single set of inputs into a $413,983 detailed proposal and a matching $373K–$455K feasibility band — two views of the same engine, agreeing with each other. Individual projects vary more, which is why every output is benchmarked and reviewed.
Under two minutes to a first-pass, line-item budget across all 21 CSI divisions — work that used to take a senior estimator the better part of a day. The AI fills the fields and shows its work; the estimator confirms the scope and owns final pricing against real sub-bids. No staff displaced.
The vertical page: a plan set to a priced budget across all 21 CSI divisions in under two minutes, checked at −0.2% against six of the estimator’s own sealed bids.
The product page: what we build, how it is verified, and who it is actually for.
Before you trust a system with a number you don’t have, it has to reproduce one you do. The method in full.
Practical AI for small and mid-sized business. Live products, verified numbers, and your experts in charge of every decision.