Calibrated against real bids — and it holds.
The engine was tuned by comparing its output, division by division, against a senior estimator’s actual sealed bids from six completed projects, and adjusting the rate tables until they agreed. In aggregate across that calibration set, the engine’s totals landed within a fraction of a percent of the estimator’s own — a −0.2% aggregate variance on the calibrated sector. That’s the Mirror Test: the engine had to reproduce bids the estimator already knew were right before anyone asked it to price something new. (Individual projects vary more; that’s why every output is benchmarked and reviewed.)
One validated production run turned a single set of inputs into a $413,983 detailed proposal and, in feasibility mode, a matching $373K–$455K budget band — two views of the same engine, agreeing with each other.
No staff displaced. The estimator reviews every field the AI fills, and final pricing stays with the estimator’s judgment and real sub-bids.